Information about the article

Article type:
Original article

Index UDK: 1(091)

Year, Volume, Number:
2025, Vol. 13, № 3 (51)

Pages: 148-158

The theory of symbolism as the basis of philosophical thought of the culture of the Silver Age

Natalya G. Kovalenko
Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages and Culture of Speech, St. Petersburg State Agrarian University, 2 Petersburg Highway street, St. Petersburg, Pushkin, 196601, Russia, nataly6707@mail.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5397-316X

EDN: QUAUVF
DOI: 10.21685/2307-9525-2025-13-3-14

Category: HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY

For citation:
Kovalenko N.G. The theory of symbolism as the basis of philosophical thought of the culture of the Silver Age. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal "Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo" = Electronic scientific journal "Science. Society. State". 2025;13(3):148–158. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21685/2307-9525-2025-13-3-14

...................................

Received: 07.04.2025

Accepted: 30.07.2025
.......................................

Open access

Abstract
Background. The present study attempts to substantiate the philosophy of symbolism as a methodology of modern humanitarian cognition. One of the civilisational features of Russia and the domestic sphere of spiritual culture is such a historical and cultural phenomenon as the Silver Age. It was within its framework that the discussion and identification of the significance of the theory of the symbolic for the comprehension of the essence of being took place. The symbol as an instrument of synthesis of mythological and religious levels of spirituality became the bridge that united the outer world and the inner world of man as a person. Symbolic provides the unity of the sphere of culture and individual consciousness of a single person. Such an outstanding cultural figure of the Silver Age as A.F. Losev made a great contribution to the Russian philosophy of symbolism, which became one of the research objectives of this paper. The relevance of the study is confirmed by the fact that today the need to consolidate traditional values of the spirit is on the agenda, and the symbol is historically such a value. Materials and methods. The source of the work was the classical philosophical works of domestic thinkers (Berdyaev, Lossky, Losev, Florensky) and theorists of the philosophy of symbolism in its artistic and aesthetic form of the era of the turn of the 19th - 20th centuries. Methodologically justified itself applied the main method of research as a method of cultural-comparative with reliance on the principle of historicism. It allowed substantiating the thesis that the symbolic as signification or commemoration became a factor in the formation of human thinking and language, and the connection between mythological and religious is the beginning of the spirituality of humanity. Results. The main results of this work should include the proof of A.F. Losev’s idea of the symbol as the integrity of objective reality, which encompasses the elements of abstract thinking: the opposition of elements of reality, the fusion of these elements into a synthetic whole, the generalisation of empirical experience in the form of a theoretical doctrine. According to Losev, the symbol of a thing is in the identification of internal regularity. Conclusions. The general conclusion of the study is the thesis that the Russian philosophy of symbolism and symbolism as a methodology for analyzing the aesthetic in the culture of the Silver Age had the most noticeable impact on the domestic and European spiritual cultures by trying to express the deep experiences of a person as a person. The existential orientation of Russian symbolism is still in demand today not only in historical and philosophical terms, but also in practical terms to preserve domestic traditional value guidelines.

Keywords
philosophy of symbolism, myth, symbol, sign, religious consciousness, culture of the Silver Age, traditional Russian values

References

1. Talerov P.I. (ed.). Bezvlastie: realiya ili utopiya? Anarkhistskie idei pereustroystva obshchestva: kollektivnaya monografiya = Anarchy: reality or utopia? Anarchist ideas for reorganizing society: a collective monograph. Saint Petersburg: Russkaya khristianskaya gumanitarnaya akademiya im. F.M. Dostoevskogo, 2025:588. (In Russ.)

2. Talerov P.I. (ed.). Apologiya bezvlastiya: Anarkhistskaya al'ternativa resheniya sotsial'no-politicheskikh problem = Apology of anarchy: An anarchist alternative to solving socio-political problems. Saint Petersburg: Russkaya khristianskaya gumanitarnaya akademiya, 2022:428. (In Russ.)

3. Aref'ev M.A., Davydenkova A.G., Vasilenkova A.A. The phenomenon of volunteerism as a reflection of the traditional value of mutual assistance and support (on the 100th anniversary of the death of
P.A. Kropotkin) // Gumanitariy: aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnoy nauki i obrazovaniya = Humanitarian: current issues in humanities and education. 2021;21(3):262–272. (In Russ.). doi: 10.15507/2078-9823.55.021.202103.262-272

4. Vygotskiy L.S. Myshlenie i rech' = Thinking and speech. Moscow: AST, 2024:572. (In Russ.)

5. Vygotskiy L.S. Psikhologiya iskusstva = Psychology of Art. Moscow: AST, 2017:496. (In Russ.)

6. Ivanov V.I. Rodnoe i vselenskoe = Native and universal. Moscow: Respublika, 1994:427. (In Russ.)

7. Mineralova I.G. Russkaya literatura Serebryanogo veka. Poetika simvolizma = Russian literature of the Silver Age. Poetics of Symbolism. Moscow: Flinta, 2009:272. (In Russ.)

8. N.L. Brodskiy, Sidorov N.P. (comp.). Ot simvolizma do «Oktyabrya» = From symbolism to October revolution. Moscow: Novaya Moskva, 1924:303. (In Russ.)

9. Mirimanov V.B. Iskusstvo i mif: tsentral'nyy obraz kartiny mira: monografiya = Art and myth: the central image of the world picture: monograph. Moscow: Soglasie, 1997:327. (In Russ.)

10. Pogodin A.L. Bogi i geroi Ellady = Gods and heroes of Hellas. Moscow: Veche, 2024:343. (In Russ.)

11. Erasov B.S. (comp.). Sravnitel'noe izuchenie tsivilizatsiy: khrestomatiya = Comparative study of civilizations: a reader. Moscow: Aspekt press, 1999:555. (In Russ.)

12. Kovalenko N.G. Symbolic approach to the problem of myth-making in the philosophy of A.F. Losev (on the 130th anniversary of his birth). Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke = Context and reflection: philosophy about the world and man. 2021;10(3A):65–75. (In Russ.). doi: 10.34670/AR.2021.82.72.008

13. Losev A.F. Samoe samo = The very self. Moscow: EKSMO-Press, 1999:1022. (In Russ.)

14. Losev A.F. Znak. Simvol. Mif: trudy po yazykoznaniyu = Sign. Symbol. Myth: works on linguistics. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 1982:480. (In Russ.)

15. Losev A.F. Filosofiya imeni = Philosophy of the name. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo Olega Abyshko, 2016:672. (In Russ.)

16. Losev A.F Dialektika mifa = Dialectics of myth. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008:303. (In Russ.)

17. Losev A.F. Filosofiya. Mifologiya. Kul'tura = Philosophy. Mythology. Culture. Moscow: Politizdat, 1991:525. (In Russ.)

18. Nenasheva M.V., Makulin A.V., Terebikhin N.M., Demyashina V.V. On the role of social synergetics in understanding the modern world. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura = Society: philosophy, history, culture. 2025;(2):38–46. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24158/fik.2025.2.4

19. Averintsev S.S. Sofiya-Logos = Sophia-Logos. Kiev: Dukh і Lіtera, 2001:460.

20. Belyy A. Simvolizm kak miroponimanie = Symbolism as a worldview. Moscow: Respublika, 1994:528. (In Russ.)

21. Zakharyan T.B. Sacred symbol in the language of religion: PhD abstract. Ekaterinburg, 2006:25. (In Russ.)

22. Shleyermakher F. Germenevtika = Hermeneutics. Translated from German by A.L. Volsky; scientific editor N.O. Guchinskaya. Saint Petersburg: Evropeyskiy Dom, 2004:241. (In Russ.)

23. Platon. Gosudarstvo. Dialogi. Apologiya Sokrata = State. Dialogues. Apology of Socrates. Moscow: Eksmo, 2024:733. (In Russ.)

24. Romanenko Yu.M. The modernity of myth or the myth of modernity. Rossiya – istoriko-kul'turnye konstanty i perspektivy razvitiya detstva: sb. nauch. tr. XXX Mezhdunar. konf. (g. Sankt-Peterburg, 17–18 aprelya 2024 g.) = Russia is historical and cultural constants and prospects for the development of childhood: proceedings of the XXX International Conference (St. Petersburg, April 17–18, 2024). Saint Petersburg: POLITEKh-PRESS, 2024:134–140. (In Russ.)

25. Mamardashvili M.K., Pyatigorskiy A.M., Senokosov Yu.P. Simvol i soznanie. Metafizicheskie rassuzhdeniya o soznanii, simvolike i yazyke = Symbol and consciousness. metaphysical reflections on consciousness, symbolism and language. Moscow: Shkola «Yazyki russkoy kul'tury», 1997:224. (In Russ.)

26. Averintsev S.S. Slovo Bozhie i slovo chelovecheskoe. Rimskie rechi = The Word of God and the Word of Man. Roman Speeches. Moscow: Nikeya, 2023:395. (In Russ.)

27. Losskiy N.O. Istoriya russkoy filosofii = History of Russian philosophy. Moscow: Sov. pisatel', 1991:478. (In Russ.)

28. Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukkha = Philosophy of free spirit. Moscow: Respublika, 1994:480. (In Russ.)

29. Ivanova A.I. On the role of religious symbol in the study of human essence: Paul. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Obshchestvennye nauki = University proceedings. North Caucasian region. Social sciences. 2023;(1):17–23. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18522/2687-0770-2023-1-17-23

30. Medvedev N.V. The Hermeneutic Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Bulletin. Series: Humanities. 2012;(10):252–256. (In Russ.)

31. Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsiy. Ocherki o germenevtike = Conflict of interpretations. Essays on Hermeneutics. Moscow: KANON-press-Ts: Kuchkovo pole, 2002:624. (In Russ.)

32. Florenskiy P.Α. Sochineniya: v 4 t. T. 1 = Essays in 4 volumes. Volume 1. Moscow: Mysl', 1994:797. (In Russ.)

33. Florenskiy P.A. Sochineniya: v 2 t. T. 2: U vodorazdelov mysli istiny = Essays in 2 volumes. Volume 2: at the watersheds of thought are truths. Moscow: Pravda, 1990:448. (In Russ.)

34. Losev A.F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo = The problem of symbol and realistic art. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1995:320. (In Russ.)

35. Kovalenko N.G. Problems of "symbol" and "symbolism" in the philosophy of A.F. Losev. Molodye uchenye v nauchnom obespechenii sel'skogo khozyaystva na sovremennom etape: sb. nauch. tr. Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. molodykh uchenykh Severo-Zapadnogo federal'nogo okruga (g. Sankt-Peterburg, Pushkin, 18–21 noyabrya 2003 g.). Ch. 2. = Young scientists in scientific education of rural economy in the modern era: proceedings of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference of young people of the North-Western federal district (St. Petersburg, Pushkin, November 18–21, 2003). Part 2. Saint Petersburg, Pushkin: Sankt-Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet, 2004:180–183. (In Russ.)

36. Kovalenko N.G. Symbol, symbolic thinking and symbolism in culture. Aktual'nye voprosy filosofii, kul'turologii, sotsiologii i politologii: sb. st. = Current issues in philosophy, cultural studies, sociology and political science: proceedings. Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet, 2007:126–139. (In Russ.)

Дата создания: 22.09.2025 12:13
Дата обновления: 22.09.2025 18:33